Superficial coinage
from Coining your own terminology
Philosophers and mathematicians create [New Terms
This is because they A New Way to Cut Up the World and created a new concept.
We need a word to call it, and we have no choice but to create it.
Look at what clever philosophers and mathematicians of the past have created words,
To imitate only the superficial "Creating Words" part of the process is
It's a lame "you don't get it" look.
If the concept the word is pointing to isn't useful, it's going to be hard to get more people to use the word.
Yukio Mishima の話を思い出した/villagepump/issac.icon
Unlike the frivolous vogue word, the coined word of a literary scholar is meaningless without the utmost earnestness to express what cannot be expressed with the existing words by any means, even if the words are bent.
Literature Reader, JOIS, where Finnegans Wake is mentioned.
This is a subtraction from Naoki Yanase, "How translation should be done" (Iwanami Shinsho), p.186.
Why can't we have frivolous buzzwords?/villagepump/issac.icon
No "seriousness"?
It goes along with the above ["They new ways of cutting the world create new concepts"].
I'm not sure if it's the spirit or...
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/表層的な造語 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.